KAY COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY

Adopted by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee, May 15th, 2025

WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) conflicts with the original public meaning of the Constitution of the United States, the principles upon which the United States is established, and the deeply rooted history and tradition of the United States regarding the nature of marriage and state powers; and 

WHEREAS, in 2004, the People of Oklahoma affirmed State Question 711 – now codified in the Oklahoma Constitution, Art. II, § 35 – with over seventy-five percent of Oklahomans voting to recognize marriage as the union of one man and one woman, prohibit marriage benefits for unmarried individuals, invalidate same-sex marriages from other states, and make issuing licenses in violation a misdemeanor; and 

WHEREAS, liberty is and has long been understood – from Blackstone to the Framers to America’s history and tradition until 2015 – as individual freedom from unwarranted governmental intrusion, not a right to a particular governmental entitlement as falsely asserted in Obergefell; and 

WHEREAS, when the Framers proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” they referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans are created in the image of God and therefore of inherent worth; and 

WHEREAS, Obergefell asserts that governmental licensing of same-sex marriage is necessary to confer human dignity, contrary to Justice Thomas’ observation that, first, “the Constitution contains no ‘dignity’ Clause,” and second, “even if it did, the government would be incapable of bestowing dignity,” and 

WHEREAS Obergefell abuses the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process clause to fabricate substantive rights, a practice Justice Clarence Thomas has frequently urged the court to abandon, including in Dobbs v. Jackson; and 

WHEREAS, Obergefell’s inversion of the natural and true meaning of liberty causes collateral damage to other aspects of our constitutional order that protect liberty, including religious liberty; and 

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Windsor, 57031 U.S. 744 (2013), that the definition of marriage is “an area that has long been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States,” meaning that Oklahoma, and not the Supreme Court, has the right to regulate marriage for its citizens; and 

WHEREAS, Obergefell requires states to license and recognize same-sex marriages in complete contravention of their own constitutions or electorate, thus undermining the civil liberties of those states’ residents and voters without any valid Constitutional warrant for doing so; and 

WHEREAS, for millennia marriage has been understood – both in biblical teaching and in the Anglo-American common-law tradition – as the lifelong covenant union of one man and one woman; and 

WHEREAS, Obergefell arbitrarily and unjustly rejected and prohibited states from recognizing this definition of marriage in favor of its own definition of marriage and a novel, flawed interpretation of key clauses within the Constitution and our nation’s legal and cultural precedents; and 

WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision was illegitimate because two of the Justices in the majority ruling, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, had previously officiated same-sex weddings, and thus were not impartial triers of fact, and therefore should have recused themselves according to 28 U.S.C. § 455; and 

WHEREAS, Chief Justice John Roberts pointed out that the Obergefell decision vilifies people of faith by “portray[ing] everyone who does not share the majority’s ‘better informed understanding’ as bigoted,” and Justice Alito wrote similarly that the Obergefell decision vilifies people of faith by falsely comparing those who recognize that marriage is between a man and a woman to those who oppose interracial marriage, a comparison now frequently weaponized against people of faith; and 

WHEREAS, the Obergefell decision has resulted in litigation directly targeting people of faith- such as Colorado baker Jack Phillips and Washington florist Barronelle Stutzman – for adhering to the historic definition of marriage; and 

WHEREAS, by declaring sex differences legally irrelevant to marriage, Obergefell has been invoked to erase biological distinctions in other arenas, threatening women’s privacy, safety, and athletic opportunities; and 

WHEREAS, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the Supreme Court restored to the States authority over areas “the Constitution does not prohibit the States from regulating,” thereby inviting reconsideration of Obergefell on the same federalism grounds. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE 1ST SESSION OF THE 60TH OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING THEREIN: 

THAT the Oklahoma legislature hereby urges the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn its unconstitutional holding in Obergefell v. Hodges and recognize that marriage is between one man and one woman, or return full authority over marriage policy to the several States. 

THAT the Legislature reaffirms article II, § 35 of the Oklahoma Constitution and declares that marriage in Oklahoma shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman. 

THAT the Chief Clerk of the Oklahoma Senate and the Chief Clerk of the Oklahoma House of Representatives shall transmit copies of this resolution to the Supreme Court of the United States, to the President of the United States Senate, to the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, to each member of the Oklahoma congressional delegation, and to the Attorneys General of the several States. 

Resolved, That this Resolution above is fully supported, and has been approved by the Kay County GOP County Committee on this 15th day of May, 2025 and shall be forwarded to Senator Coleman, Senator Pederson, Representative Luttrell, Representative Pfeiffer, and Arthur Schaper, Field Director, MassResistance, for appropriate distribution.

Adopted by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee, January 17th, 2025

WHEREAS, school-based services falls under the purview of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I.D.E.A.), there is no legal authority for the Oklahoma state legislators, Oklahoma State Superintendent of Education, OSDE, K-12 public schools, and the Oklahoma Health Care Authority to expand school-based services. This civil rights program only serves special education students and is limited to educationally necessary related services for the student to access classroom instruction and activities to receive a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). This program is not to be used for medical services and includes non-educational medically necessary related services such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, behavioral and psychological therapy, and speech and language therapy;

WHEREAS, School-based Health Centers (SBHC) are student-focused socialized healthcare services for all students on campus, off campus, or by way of telehealth. SBHCs are intended by the federal government to replace your primary healthcare provider for your child, including primary health care services. A one-time parental consent for the student’s entire public-school experience and consent gives blanket authority to the school-based providers to make decisions, testing, and treatment without the presence of the parent. These centers or clinics are funded by the Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). When schools receive school-based health centers status, they are working outside their professional scope of academics and violate medical ethics because medical ethics do not allow physicians to treat minors without a parent or guardian present;

WHEREAS, Parents must be present at the time of treatment to prevent a power imbalance. Medical ethics do not allow the doctor to make medical decisions on behalf of the child, re-consent is insufficient;

WHEREAS, the Oklahoma State Constitution says, there’s no constitutional right to school-based healthcare. In fact, the state constitution clearly states that the primary purpose of public schools is academics and free from sectarian control. There is no mention of state funded healthcare clinics on K-12 public school campuses;

WHEREAS, Title 210.State Department of Education. Chapter 1. State Board of Education. Subchapter 1. General Provisions 210:1-1-1. Declaration of Foundational Values says: ‘…academics are the primary purpose of public schools…” sde.ok.gov/sites/default/files/RuleText 210.1-1-1, 7.pdf 

WHEREAS, “The ultimate responsibility of children’s education rests firmly upon the shoulders of their parents. All responsibilities of an educator and servant of public education are responsibilities delegated from these parents and guardians, and such responsibilities are to be taken with full sobriety and respect as is befitting the care and training of all children.” sde.ok.gov/sites/default/files/Rule Text 210.1-1-1, 7.pdf 

THEREFORE, The Oklahoma State Superintendent of Education shall immediately perform a comprehensive compliance IEP review of all K-12 public schools. All IEPs containing medical related services that are not educationally necessary shall be removed from the IEP and placed in a 504 Plan. 

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the KAY County GOP strongly condemn the expansion of school-based services and K-12 school-based health care centers and clinics and urge our state elected officials and OSDE to reject the expansion of school-based services and K-12 school-based health centers/clinics. 

WE FURTHER RESOLVE, the state elected officials, OSDE, and K-12 public schools shall reject all federal money including but not limited to block grants for the expansion of school-based services or for the implementation of K-12 school-based health care centers (or clinics). The State Superintendent of Education shall ensure all contracts involving the expansion of school-based services and school-based health centers/clinics are terminated. 

WE FURTHER RESOLVE, The State Superintendent of Education shall amend OSDE policies and rules to ensure OSDE and all K-12 public schools work in their professional scope of academics, not school-based healthcare; require all K-12 public schools to terminate their school-based provider status with OHCA; and OSDE shall amend the Oklahoma Special Education Policy to ensure the IEPs and school-based services are compliant with I.D.E.A. 

Passed by the members of the Kay County GOP on this 17th day of January in the year of our Lord 2025. 

Adopted by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee, October 1, 2024

Whereas, The Oklahoma GOP Finance Committee reportedly met in early July and determined that Kay County would be required to remit a payment of $619.80 by October 5th, but failed to notify us of that until September 7th; and

Whereas, The Oklahoma GOP has completely failed to disclose the expenses and income from the 2024 State Convention to the delegates as directed by the State Committee; and

Whereas, The Kay County Republican Committee has received only limited details on exactly how this money would be spent in order to further the stated causes; and

Whereas, The rules of the Oklahoma Republican Party only authorizes the State Finance Committee to “establish quotas… designating the responsibility of each county… to provide the funds required to meet the… organizational needs,… and to effect agreements between the State Finance Committee and county republican organizations for equitable division of funds raised within each county”; and

Whereas, The Finance Committee Chair has not provided adequate information regarding the suggested fundraising scheme; Therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Kay County Republican Party Committee denies this agreement and declines to contribute the demanded amount of $619.80, and

Resolved, That the Kay County Republican Committee will not monetarily contribute to the Oklahoma Republican Party in the future until such time as the state headquarters cooperates with the State Committee in providing financial information in a transparent and timely manner.
Adopted this 1^st day of October, 2024 by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee.

Adopted by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee, April 18, 2024

WHEREAS WHO (World Health Organization) Constitution Article 1 states their objective as “the  attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health”; and 

WHEREAS the forced COVID-19 mandates on masks, lockdowns, experimental injections, and the  simultaneous refusal of those in authority to explore alternative preventatives and therapeutics demonstrated to  us that the definition of the ideal of what is “health” is not universally accepted and so the WHO’s constituted  objective is not universally accepted; and 

WHEREAS WHO Constitution Article 20 requires members to be held accountable to the WHO for  following convention guidance or agreements¹; and 

WHEREAS the WHO resolved in December 2021 to develop a legally binding centralized and globally  uniform pandemic response. The 2 June 2023 draft, named “WHO convention, agreement or other international  instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” (WHO CA+), and the 30 Oct 2023 draft, named the WHO Pandemic Agreement, both aim to correct what they see as the catastrophic failure of not  having a globally uniform response during the COVID-19 pandemic²; and 

WHEREAS the WHO publicly claims that States would maintain their sovereignty but under WHO  CA+ Article 3 General Principles and Approaches³, in exercising their sovereignty States “shall uphold the  purposes and objectives of the WHO CA+ and carry out their obligations under the WHO CA+.” In other  words, State sovereignty only goes so far as the restrictions of the WHO Pandemic Agreement will allow, which  is a clear and direct encroachment on State sovereignty; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 18 Communication and Public Awareness⁴ and  Article 9 Research and Development⁵ pandemic-related mis/disinformation is addressed as needing  management at “local, national, regional and international levels” and authority to determine measures,  procedures and guidelines for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response is authorized to the WHO  Parties under Article 16 International Collaboration and Cooperation⁶ leading us to conclude that Parties of the  WHO Pandemic Agreement claim the authority to define mis/disinformation; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 1 Use of Terms the WHO’s definition of  “infodemic” suggests that people exploring and/or following guidance or information that is not approved by  the WHO would problematically lead to a mistrust in health authorities and undermine public health and social  measures⁷; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 2 Objective and Scope⁸ the Pandemic  Agreement “applies at all times” which raises questions as to the overreaching scope of control this body would  assume and under Article 12 Access and Benefit Sharing⁹ a WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing  System (WHO PABS System) is oddly specified to be used “at all times, both during and between pandemics”;  and 

WHEREAS an option to WHO CA+ Article 15 International Collaboration and Cooperation gives the  WHO Director General authority to declare a global pandemic¹⁰; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 1 Use of Terms¹¹ and Article 5 One Health¹² the  definition of “One Health Approach” takes into account the health of ecosystems and calls Parties to “take  action on climate change” which leads us to doubt the WHO’s presumed authority being confined to pandemics  and public health and to question whether “climate change” would ever be deemed an event warranting WHO  measures and mandates; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 21 Conference of the Parties¹³ subsidiary bodies  shall be established to address such things as product selection and compliance and under WHO CA+ Article 22  Implementation and Compliance Committee¹⁴, Article 23 Panel of Experts to Provide Scientific Advice¹⁵ and  Article 24 Pandemic-Related Products Expert Committee¹⁶ those subsidiary bodies are defined in detail and raise concerns about censorship of pandemic-related information as well as a centralized and restricted selection  of pandemic-related products; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 27 Withdrawal¹⁷ withdrawal from WHO  Pandemic Agreement is not immediate but requires a waiting period of at least 3 years and requires formal  withdrawal from individual instruments and protocols in addition to the WHO Pandemic Agreement; and 

WHEREAS under WHO Pandemic Agreement Article 34 Settlement of Disputes¹⁸ an unreasonable  amount of authority is given to the Depositary who is the Secretary General of United Nations and also raises  questions about giving up USA national sovereignty to the named “International Court of Justice” that is set up  to settle disputes; and  

WHEREAS the WHO Pandemic Agreement adheres to objectionable “woke” ideology throughout the document¹⁹ stating in their objective that they are “guided by equity” which is the sameness of outcomes  rather than equality which is the sameness of opportunity, and that they aspire “to the progressive realization of  universal health coverage” whereby richer countries are obligated to financially support developing countries,  and that in the formulation of pandemic responses Parties must not seek the most qualified participants but must  “promote equitable representation… as well as equal and meaningful participation of young people and  women”; and 

WHEREAS the OKGOP platform states “We support the patient-doctor relationship and oppose  nationalized medicine”; and 

WHEREAS the OKGOP platform states “We support full consumer access to safe foods, medications,  and alternative treatments including access to all information regarding such substances”; and 

WHEREAS the OKGOP platform states “We support the right of every citizen to determine if they will  receive a vaccination, medication, experimental drug or therapeutic without force of coercion”; and 

WHEREAS under US Constitution Article 1 Section 8 and Article 2 Sections 2 and 3 control of citizen  health autonomy is an enumerated power of neither Congress nor the President and they therefore have no  power to turn citizen health autonomy over to a created global entity; and  

WHEREAS under the Bill of Rights Amendment 1 Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom  of speech of which the WHO Pandemic Agreement aims to infringe upon with their WHO-approved pandemic related information; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 

RESOLVED That the Kay County Republican Committee rejects the WHO Pandemic Agreement and supports all national, state and local governing bodies asserting sovereignty and refusing to enforce within their jurisdiction any mandate originating from the WHO Pandemic Agreement and any measure that infringes on their citizens’ personal health autonomy and/or freedom of speech. Further, we condemn the enforcement by any national, state or local governing body of any mandate or measure originating from the WHO Pandemic Agreement that infringes on citizens’ individual  health autonomy and/or freedom of speech.

December 14, 2023

Whereas, the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4 provides: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion… .”

Whereas, the United States, as a sovereign nation, is defined by its territorial borders;

Whereas, it is the immediate goal of hostile nations and global forces to destroy the United States as a sovereign nation and to incorporate its land and citizens into a Marxist “New World Order;”

Whereas, every federally elected official takes a sworn oath to protect the United States against its enemies, “both foreign and domestic;”

Whereas, it is the perceived policy of the current Democrat Administration, supported by all Democrat and some Republican members in the House and Senate, to bring about this destruction;

Whereas, to carry out this maleficent plan the Administration and its supporters have unlawfully done away with any control of our southern border and collaborated with inimical powers to bring across the open border millions of criminals, many from countries openly hostile to the United States, creating a clear and present danger to national security;

Whereas, the cost of supporting these criminals is contributing massively to our already unsustainable federal debt;

Whereas, since January 2023 the United States House of Representatives has done nothing to stem the criminal invasion of our Country;

Whereas, unlimited deficit spending and accumulation of unbearable federal debt has continued unabated using the blackmail ploy of passing massive omnibus spending bills by continuing resolutions “to avoid financial calamity brought about by a government shut-down;” and

Whereas, our beloved nation now finds itself in a life and death struggle for its survival and can no longer delay dealing with criminal invasion, nation destroying deficit spending, and unbearable federal debt; now, therefore, be it

Resolved: That the Kay County Republican Committee of Oklahoma requires our elected members of Congress – Senator Lankford, Senator Mullin, and Representative Lucas– to vote nay on any further continuing budget resolutions – even at the cost of shutting down all non-emergency functions of government – until substantive and irrevocable steps have been taken to close the southern border of this most sovereign of nations: the United States of America; and

Resolved: That this Resolution be forwarded to the Republican County Party of the other 76 Oklahoma Counties urging that they adopt it so as to send our elected representatives a united and unmistakable message: Stop the Invasion Now!

Passed by the County Committee of the Kay County Republican Party on December 14, 2023

Sponsored by Brian Hobbs

Adopted by the Kay County Republican Party County Committee, October 12, 2023

WHEREAS, President Donald J. Trump has been corruptly and unlawfully targeted by Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, Jack Smith, through indictments based upon political grounds; and

WHEREAS, The 14th amendment guarantees fair and equal treatment under the law-for all. Our justice system demands that we investigate crimes in search of perpetrators, rather than investigating citizens in search of crimes, for political gain; and

WHEREAS, The Fifth Amendment guarantees citizens are innocent until proven guilty; and Donald J. Trump has been innocent of any and all crimes he’s been accused of; and

WHEREAS, The Kay County Republican Party believes in free and fair elections and justice through equality of rights and equal treatment under the law; and

WHEREAS, The Kay County Republican Party believes that campaigning for elected office should not include the weaponization of the federal government and criminal justice system; be it therefore

RESOLVED, That the Kay County Republican Party calls on our federal delegation, James Lankford, Markwayne Mullin, Frank Lucas and/or any Republican Party representative who represents the people of Kay County, Oklahoma to condemn the continuous political persecution of President Donald J. Trump.

Kay County Republican Party of Oklahoma

October 12^th, 2023

Whereas, Ryan Walters is being an effective and courageous public servant by working to:

1. stand up to the Oklahoma political machines,
2. remove pornography from schools,
3. eradicate critical race theory and DEI,
4. remove Marxist propaganda,
5. push back against the lies of the teachers’ unions,
6. focus on improving education and empowering parents;

Whereas, There are establishment forces in Oklahoma (Democrat officials, Republican officials, teachers’ unions, NGO’s, private organizations, and media) aligning to attempt to remove and undermine Ryan Walters from his position as Oklahoma State Superintendent of Public Instruction;

Whereas, Ryan Walters actions are consistent with the Education portion of the Platform of the Oklahoma Republican Party;

Resolved, That the Kay County Republican Party of Oklahoma commends State Superintendent Ryan Walters for the steps he has taken to clean up our schools and encourages him to continue on in that task with our full support;

Resolved, That we strongly condemn ANY Republican (Mark McBride or any other) member of the Oklahoma House or Senate who votes for or supports in any way the impeachment, removal, or undermining of Ryan Walters from being Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Passed by the Kay County Republican Party Committee on October 12, 2023.

Kay County Republican Party of Oklahoma

October 12, 2023

Whereas, the Oklahoma Republican Party Platform states that we are opposed to higher taxes, deficit spending, funding the government by continuing resolution rather than a formal budget, and wars without proper declaration;

Whereas, OK CD3 Representative Frank Lucas voted for H.R.5860 – “Continuing Appropriations Act, 2024 and Other Extensions Act” which continues to fund the Federal Government at current levels with out spending cuts required as evidenced by a debt of $33 Trillion;

Whereas, the former Speaker of the US House of Representatives broke multiple promises that had been negotiated during his campaign for the office of speaker, including release of the January 6 footage to the PUBLIC, not continuing the funding of the Federal Government by continuing resolutions, and a serious investigation into the corruption of the Biden family;

Whereas, OK CD3 Representative Frank Lucas voted to retain the former Speaker regardless of his broken promises and his constituents’ expressed wishes, be it therefore

Resolved, That Representative Frank Lucas is Censured by the Kay County Republican Party for his recent and longstanding support of reckless government spending, and refusal to hold accountable the former speaker of the United States House of Representatives.

Passed by the Kay County Republican Party Committee on October 12, 2023.